Federal Defenders of New York Second Circuit Blog

IAC claim rejected on direct appeal because lack of prejudice to defendant is “beyond doubt” and district court sufficiently explained its sentence given “the lesser specificity required for a [revocation] sentence”

by

Not sure why United States v. Antonio Ortiz, 2d Cir. No. 22-1775-cr (April 30, 2024), is a published opinion rather than a summary order. Judge Menashi’s opinion for the panel (Calabresi, Menashi, Perez) rejects Ortiz’s challenge to his five-year sentence, imposed upon revocation of supervised release after the district court found that he raped his … Read more

Circuit holds that federal supervised release only begins when the defendant is released from subsequent state custody, not when he is released from federal custody into state custody.

by

In United States v. Freeman, No. 23-6394 (2d Cir. April 23, 2024), the defendant was ordered to begin his supervised release almost ten years after his release from federal prison, when he was finally released from state custody on charges that were dismissed. Freeman argued that his supervised release term began upon his release from … Read more

Defendant’s complaint concerning scope of prior appellate mandate is barred by appellate waiver in new plea agreement, and the district court did not err in considering his sectarian motivation at sentencing

by

In United States v. Maalik Alim Jones, 2d Cir. No. 22-2958-cr (April 29, 2024), the panel (Walker, Park, Perez) in a per curiam opinion rejects Jones’s challenge to his 25-year sentence, imposed on remand after a prior appeal and following Jones’s guilty plea under a new plea agreement in which he waived the right to … Read more

Supreme Court: District Court’s Failure To Enter Preliminary Order Of Forfeiture Prior To Sentencing Does Not Bar Court From Ordering Forfeiture At Sentencing.

by

In United States v. McIntosh, No. 22-7386 (U.S. Apr. 17, 2024), a unanimous Supreme Court held that a district court’s failure to enter a preliminary order of forfeiture prior to sentencing, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(B), “does not bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing subject to harmless-error principles on appellate … Read more

Yet again, the Second Circuit vacates an unexplained condition of supervised release.

by

Yes, the Second Circuit means it! If the district court doesn’t explain why a special condition of supervised release is required in a particular case, the Circuit will vacate the condition. Today, yet again, the Second Circuit vacated a condition of supervised release because the district court did not explain the reasons for imposing the … Read more

Special conditions of supervised release must be based on an individualized assessment of the defendant and adequately explained.

by

In two recent decisions, the Second Circuit reiterated the requirements for imposing special conditions of supervised release: a sentencing court must undertake an “individualized assessment” of the defendant and “state on the record the reason for imposing” any special condition. The failure to do so is error. In United States v. Alex Oliveras, No. 21-2954, … Read more

Supreme Court narrows the “expanded” safety valve.

by

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), the so-called “safety valve” provision, district courts have a limited power to impose a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum in certain drug cases. The defendant’s offense must not involve particular aggravating factors (violence, guns) and the defendant must have a limited criminal history. But how limited? The 2018 First … Read more

Mistaken Expectation of a Lower Sentence Does Not Render Guilty Plea Involuntary or Unintelligent.

by

In United States v. Delvalle, No. 22-1539-cr (2d Cir. Mar. 5, 2024) (per curiam), the Court reiterated its longstanding rule that a guilty plea is not rendered involuntary or unintelligent simply because the defendant expected to receive a lower sentence than he ultimately received. Delvalle pleaded guilty to a drug conspiracy. The parties estimated that his Guidelines … Read more

A post-sentencing examination of previously seized electronic data does not violate the Fourth Amendment. And the subsequent prosecution of the defendant for producing child pornography – based on evidence discovered in that examination – is not barred by the prior plea agreement concerning his conviction for possessing child pornography.

by

In United States v. Cory Johnson, 2d Cir. No. 22-1086-cr (February 27, 2024), the panel (Livingston, Carney, Bianco) rejects Johnson’s claims and affirms his conviction and 20-year sentence for producing child pornography (CP) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). The opinion, by Chief Judge Livingston, concludes that the instant prosecution for CP production – … Read more

Circuit upholds conviction based on a plea to an indictment mistakenly alleging that the crime occurred on a date four months earlier than the actual date.

by

In United States v. Morgan, No. 22-2798 (2d Cir. February 23, 2024), the Circuit (Parker, Lynch and Khan) affirmed, in a summary order, the defendant’s conviction for being a felon in possession of ammunition based on an indictment that charged and a guilty plea that admitted to that crime occurring on March 8, 2020, although … Read more