Federal Defenders of New York Second Circuit Blog

Federal Defenders

Can a trial court determine on its own what evidence satisfies a jury’s generalized request to view exhibits or testimony “link[ing]” the defendant to an inculpatory alias?

by

United States v. Fabian, No. 22-1247-cr (2d Cir. Mar. 25, 2026) (Livingston, Lynch (writing), Menashi, Circuit Judges The Second Circuit affirmed Fabian’s conviction and 15-year sentence for conspiring to distribute crack cocaine. Fabian raised a host of challenges to his conviction and sentence, but the panel placed at “the forefront of this appeal” the district … Read more

Second Circuit reaffirms that confronting defendant with evidence of guilt can “create the kind of atmosphere of significant restraint that triggers Miranda.”

by

United States v. Pence, No. 24-1025-cr (2d Cir. Apr. 10, 2026) (Cabranes, Chin (writing), Robinson, Circuit Judges). In a decision the panel described as “a close call,” the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Pence’s motion to suppress statements he made to agents before they gave Miranda warnings. In an opinion by Judge … Read more

Circuit affirms supervised-release condition authorizing suspicionless monitoring of defendant’s internet use

by

In United States v. Brown, No. 24-1227 (2d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026), the Circuit (by Judge Sullivan, joined by Judges Wesley and Park) affirmed the district court’s imposition of a special condition of supervised release authorizing the probation office to conduct constant, suspicionless monitoring of “all activity” on internet-capable devices used by Brown, including those … Read more

Second Circuit: 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) Prohibits the Possession of Authentic Immigration Documents Obtained by Fraud, Not Just the Possession of Counterfeit Documents.

by

In United States v. Greenberg, Nos. 23-7168 and 23-7249 (2d Cir. Feb. 3, 2025) (per curiam), the Second Circuit (Walker, Robinson, Merriam, JJ.) held that 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) (“Fraud and misuse of visa, permits and other documents”) prohibits the possession of authentic immigration documents that have been obtained by fraud, not just the possession … Read more

En Banc Second Circuit: A Naturalized U.S. Citizen Has A Sixth Amendment Right To Be Advised By Defense Counsel That He May Be Denaturalized And Deported As A Result Of His Guilty Plea.

by

In United States v. Farhane, No. 20-1666 (2d Cir. Oct. 31, 2024), the en banc Second Circuit (Carney, joined by Wesley, Lee, Robinson, Perez, Nathan, Merriam, and Kahn) held that “a naturalized U.S. citizen” charged with a crime “has a Sixth Amendment right to be advised by counsel that he may be denaturalized and deported … Read more

Second Circuit: Postal Robbery And Aggravated Postal Robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2114(a), Even On Pinkerton Theory Of Liability, Are 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Crimes Of Violence.

by

In Pannell v. United States, No. 21–2849 (2d Cir. Aug. 28, 2024) (Menashi, joined by Raggi and Wesley), the Second Circuit held that postal robbery and aggravated postal robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2114(a), even pursuant to a Pinkerton theory of liability, are 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) crimes of violence. A jury convicted Pannell of conspiracy … Read more

Supreme Court: District Court’s Failure To Enter Preliminary Order Of Forfeiture Prior To Sentencing Does Not Bar Court From Ordering Forfeiture At Sentencing.

by

In United States v. McIntosh, No. 22-7386 (U.S. Apr. 17, 2024), a unanimous Supreme Court held that a district court’s failure to enter a preliminary order of forfeiture prior to sentencing, as required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(B), “does not bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing subject to harmless-error principles on appellate … Read more

Second Circuit Affirms 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B) Conviction And Sentence For Defendant Who Posted “Kill Your Senators” Video Online

by

In United States v. Hunt, No. 21-3020 (2d Cir. Sept. 20, 2023) (Walker, joined by Parker and Bianco), the Circuit affirmed Hunt’s conviction and sentence for threatening to assault and murder United States officials, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B), based on Hunt’s online posting of a video entitled “Kill Your Senators.” In the … Read more

Second Circuit Vacates §§ 924(c) And 924(j) Convictions Predicated On Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery, But Affirms § 924(c) Conviction Predicated On VICAR Assault With A Deadly Weapon.

by

In two direct appeals, the Second Circuit  addressed follow-on issues arising from United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022) (holding that attempted Hobbs Act robbery is not an 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) crime of violence). In United States v. Collymore, No. 19-596 (2d Cir. March 7, 2023) (per curiam) (Sullivan, Park, Nardini), the … Read more

The Second Circuit holds that N.Y. Attempted Third-Degree Sale of a Controlled Substance, N.Y.P.L. 220.39(1) is NOT a Guidelines Controlled Substance Offense

by

Earlier this week, on December 6, 2022, the Second Circuit held in United States v. Gibson, No. 20-3049 (2d Cir. Dec. 6, 2022), that a 2002 New York state conviction for attempted third-degree criminal sale of a controlled substance, NYPL 220.39(1) and 110.00, is not a  “controlled substance offense” under the Guidelines. Gibson was convicted … Read more