Earlier this week, the New York Times ran a story on the state of care, and lack of care, for women detained at the MDC in Brooklyn. In particular, it highlighted the stories of pregnant women, including one who lost her baby while in custody. The article notes that “[t]he treatment of women, pregnant and otherwise, … Read more
David Patton, the Executive Director and Attorney-in-Chief at the Federal Defenders of New York, published an opinion piece in yesterday’s New York Daily News. Patton points out that while much of the press following Bharara’s firing focused on his reputation as the “sheriff of Wall Street” or the drainer of the Albany swamp, these high-profile cases do … Read more
It looks like the work of dismantling the progress made under the Holder memo has begun. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has issued a memo directing US Attorneys to work with local law enforcement to identify the ‘criminals’ in their districts who are driving violent crime and prosecute them federally using all available tools. You can … Read more
In Beckles v. United States, 580 U.S. ___, 2017 WL 855781 (March 6, 2017) the Supreme Court held that Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 2551, 135 S.Ct. ___ (2015), does not apply to the Guidelines’ residual clause because “the advisory Guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the Due Process clause.” Slip op. … Read more
This morning, the Supreme Court decided Beckles v. United States. You can read the opinion here. The Court held unanimously that the Sentencing Guidelines are not subject to void-for-vagueness challenges. We will update with a more detailed analysis soon.
The United States Sentencing Commission has proposed several amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines. Because the Guidelines’ worth stems from their basis in the Commission’s expertise, the reasoning for any changes proposed by the Commission can be useful in persuading a sentencing court to either follow the proposed amendment or decline to follow the current guideline. … Read more
United States v. Melendez, No. 16-1019 (2d Cir. Feb. 16, 2007) (Leval, Calabresi, Carney). In this summary order, the Circuit vacated the denial of a motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Court ruled that the district court (Judge Hurley) clearly erred in deciding that the defendant (a client of Federal Defenders) … Read more
President Trump’s executive order titled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,” signed on Jan. 25, may have significant impacts on non-citizens with open federal criminal cases in the relatively near term. The order is only two days old and does not explicitly withdraw existing agency guidance on most issues it addresses, … Read more
In United States v. Pinto, the Second Circuit affirmed an order of restitution that was based, in part, on a government memorandum recounting an interview with a co-conspirator. The District Court had refused to order the government to produce the QuickBooks records that were a partial basis for its restitution calculations. The District Court has the discretion to decide … Read more
In United States v. Byrd, the Second Circuit affirmed a sentence despite the District Court finding an applicable guideline range different from the one agreed to by the parties in a written plea agreement. The Circuit held that although “district courts have the discretion to give effect to Guidelines calculations in plea agreements that result … Read more