Southern District Judge Alison Nathan suppressed evidence obtained as a result of “essentially limitless” warrants that were “insufficiently particularized.” The 92-page opinion in United States v. Wey, 15-cr-611 (AJN), can be accessed here. Agents executing the searches collected, among other things, personal documents and materials from Wey’s home and office. The Court found that the “catch-all” gathering of all of this material had no “linkage to the suspected criminal activity, or indeed any meaningful content-based parameter or other limiting principle” and that the Agents’ actions ran afoul of “well-established constitutional principles that provide a bulwark against the execution of general warrants.” Recognizing that it was and “extraordinary remedy,” the Court ordered suppression of all evidence gathered from both search locations.