SUMMARY SUMMARY
Here are three more s/o’s to chew on: In United States v. Glum, No. 06-3099-cr (2d Cir. April 8, 2008), the court ordered a Crosby remand even though the district court, when denying the defendant’s pro se 2255 motion, had already indicated that it would impose the same sentence. In United States v. Ogman, No. … Read more