Federal Defenders of New York Second Circuit Blog

Forfeiture Is Limited to That Authorized by the Statute Listed in the Charged Count

United States v. Annabi, Nos. 12-4988-cr(L), 12-4990-cr(Con) (2d Cir. Mar. 25, 2014), available here This published decision holds that where the government fails to invoke an applicable forfeiture provision in the indictment, and fails to correct that error prior to entry of a final judgment, forfeiture must be limited to that authorized by the statute … Read more

Defense Lawyer’s Decision Not to Call a Witness Who Might Offer Exculpatory Evidence Is a Question of Trial Strategy

PIERRE V. ERCOLE, NO. 12-3506-PR (2D CIR. MAR. 27, 2014) (SACK, LIVINGSTON, AND LOHIER) (SUMMARY ORDER), AVAILABLE HERE This case involved an ineffective assistance of counsel claim following defendant’s murder conviction.  The defendant argued that his defense lawyer was ineffective for not calling a particular witness at trial and for failing to investigate a possible witness.  The Court disagreed … Read more

A District Court’s Failure to State in Open Court Reasons for the Sentence Imposed Is Not In and of Itself Plain Error

UNITED STATES V. PALMA, NO. 13-2230-CR (2D CIR. MAR. 27, 2014) (SACK, LIVINGSTON, AND LOHIER) (SUMMARY ORDER), AVAILABLE HERE This defendant claimed that the sentencing court committed procedural error by failing to articulate the reasons for the sentence imposed and not addressing the 3553(a) factors.  On plain error review, the first challenge failed.  The Court explained that … Read more

Promise of Jail Time by District Court at Plea Hearing Did Not Give Rise to “Air of Inevitability” at Subsequent Sentencing

UNITED STATES V. DELGIORNO, NO. 13-625-CR (2D CIR. MAR. 27, 2014) (STRAUB, SACK, AND LOHIER) (SUMMARY ORDER), AVAILABLE HERE This defendant appealed his sentence and claimed that the sentencing court committed procedural error by failing to calculate the guidelines, properly consider the 3553(a) factors, and adequately explain the sentence imposed.  All challenges failed.  The district court calculated … Read more

Alford Plea Allowed Court To Conclude That Defendant Violated Supervised Release By Committing a New Crime

United States v. Glenn, No. 13-0231-cr (2d Cir. Mar. 12, 2014) (Jacobs, Livingston, and Lynch), available here Glenn appealed from an order of the District of Connecticut revoking his supervised release. The district court concluded that Glenn committed “another federal, state or local offense” in violation of the conditions of his supervised release, based solely … Read more

Term of Imprisonment May Not Run Concurrently With a Discharged Term of Imprisonment

United States v. Lucas, Nos. 12-4840-cr(L), 13-0743(Con), 13-1075(Con) (2d Cir. Mar. 17, 2014) (Parker, Lynch, and Droney) (per curiam), available here This published (and, therefore, precedential) decision reiterates what the Circuit had previously held only in non-precedential summary orders: that USSG 5G1.3(b) and 18 U.S.C. 3584 empower district courts to run sentences concurrently only to “undischarged” terms … Read more

Waiver in Plea Agreement Barred Collateral Attack on Sentence

Tellado v. United States, No. 11-3227-pr (2d Cir. Mar. 12, 2014) (Hall, Livingston, and Berman), available here This published decision affirms the denial of petitioner’s Section 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. The Court held that petitioner knowingly waived his right to collaterally attack his sentence and that the district court properly denied petitioner’s motion to … Read more

District Court Should Reconsider Consecutive Sentences for Aggravated Identity Theft

United States v. Chibuko, No. 12-0039-cr (2d Cir. Mar. 7, 2014) (Katzmann, Kearse, and Wesley) (per curiam), available here This published decision offers guidance on the procedures to be followed before a district court may impose consecutive sentences for multiple counts of aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. 1028A. Chibuko was convicted at trial of various fraud … Read more