Today the Circuit amended its decision in Blow v. United States, No. 16-1530 (Katzmann, chief judge; Wesley and Hall, circuit judges). It added a single line at the end of the opinion to say that the district judge has discretion to proceed on Blow’s 2255 petition and is not required to hold the petition in abeyance until the Supreme Court decides Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544, 2016 WL 1029080 (U.S. June 27, 2016).
The Circuit’s initial opinion was filed about two weeks ago, on July 14, 2016. It granted Blow’s motion to file a Second or Successive 2255 petition. But it “instructed” the district court to “hold Blow’s §2255 motion in abeyance pending the outcome of Beckles.”
In Beckles, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015) — which declared that the “residual clause” of the …