Federal Defenders of New York Second Circuit Blog

“Take any prescribed medications” condition of supervised release is plainly erroneous absent medically grounded, on-the-record findings that compelled medication is necessary.

United States v. McCrone, No. 22-3178 (L) (2d Cir. July 21, 2026) (Walker, Lee, Robinson) The Second Circuit today struck, on plain-error review, a supervised-release condition requiring the defendant to “continue to take any prescribed medications unless otherwise instructed by the health care provider.” Slip op. at 6. (The condition was a stock sentence embedded … Read more

18th Century norms define 21st Century privacy: Technological advances in surveillance can’t outrun analog-era expectations of privacy

Chatrie v. United States, No. 25–112 (U.S. June 29, 2026) (Opinion by Kagan, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Jackson; Gorsuch concurs in the judgment) Introduction The facts in Chatrie look daunting — a bank robbery solved through a multi-step “geofence” warrant served on Google, full of unfamiliar ideas like anonymized device lists, “Location History,” and … Read more

Supreme Court significantly narrows venue

The Supreme Court just decided Abouammo v. United States, No. 25-5146 (U.S. June 11, 2026), which significantly narrows where venue may lie in the Second Circuit. A brief summary of the case is followed by its three key rulings. Section 1519 of Title 18 makes it a crime to “knowingly… falsif[y]… any record, document, or … Read more

United States v. Ullah, No. 21-1058 (2d Cir. Apr. 21, 2026) (Pérez, J., joined by Rakoff, J., sitting by designation; Menashi, J., dissenting)

The Second Circuit reversed a material support conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2339B where a lone-wolf attacker discharged an explosive after consuming ISIS propaganda online, adopting ISIS slogans, and telling investigators he acted “on behalf of the Islamic State” – but having no actual connection to or relationship with ISIS. On this evidence, the majority … Read more

Circuit Considers, Once Again, an Electronic Search Condition . . .

This week in United States v. Jimenez, No. 24-1661 (2d Cir. Feb. 25, 2026) (Pérez, J.), the Circuit affirmed a 105-month sentence and three special conditions of supervised release. Although Jimenez (represented by this Office) did not prevail, the opinion contains significant pro-defense language useful for objecting to or challenging electronic search conditions. I. The … Read more

Circuit overturns Nassau County Executive’s bribery convictions, but affirms his honest-services fraud convictions

In United States v. Linda Mangano and Edward Mangano, 2d Cir. No. 22-861 (L) (Feb. 13, 2025), the Court upheld the defendants’ convictions for honest-services fraud and obstruction of justice, but vacates Edward Mangano’s bribery-related convictions. We focus on that aspect of Judge Livingston’s thorough opinion. Edward Mangano was the County Executive of Nassau County … Read more

Panel affirms R. Kelly’s RICO and Mann Act convictions and 30-year prison sentence; Judge Sullivan objects to “windfall” restitution of brand-name medication for herpes-infected victim.

Judge Chin’s opinion in United-States-v.-Robert-Sylvester-Kelly, 2d Cir. No. 22-1481 (L) (Feb. 12, 2025), joined almost entirely by Judges Carney and Sullivan, affirms the singer R. Kelly’s conviction for RICO and Mann Act offenses, as well as his 30-year prison sentence and a restitution award of $300,668 to “Jane,” a minor whom Kelly infected with herpes … Read more

District court erred in allowing eleven-person jury to convict the defendant, but the error is (1) not structural and (2) harmless under harmless-error analysis.

Judge Menashi’s opinion for the majority in United States v. Ricky Johnson, 2d Cir. No. 22-1289 (Sep. 6, 2024) (Menashi, joined by Englemayer, D.J.) affirms Johnson’s conviction for making threats, but creates a circuit split –and provokes a strong dissent from Judge Chin – in the process. Johnson (represented by this Office) challenged his conviction … Read more

IAC claim rejected on direct appeal because lack of prejudice to defendant is “beyond doubt” and district court sufficiently explained its sentence given “the lesser specificity required for a [revocation] sentence”

Not sure why United States v. Antonio Ortiz, 2d Cir. No. 22-1775-cr (April 30, 2024), is a published opinion rather than a summary order. Judge Menashi’s opinion for the panel (Calabresi, Menashi, Perez) rejects Ortiz’s challenge to his five-year sentence, imposed upon revocation of supervised release after the district court found that he raped his … Read more